Responses - With Paul Ryan We Have A Chance

Thanks for all of the wonderful responses to the subject message like "Doug - keep up the exceptional posts and keep the pressure on!"

 

Below are four responses of interest. 

 

The first response shows an understanding that Paul Ryan's record is not one of total fiscal responsibility as Mitt would like you to believe & the RTE posts over the past two years have documented with actual House votes.  The Ryan pick provides the chance to defeat BO because of Ryan's supposed (though not totally true) fiscally responsible reputation that will act as the discussion & debate point of the Republican position compared to BO's government dependent envisioned society position.  BO will not only accept Ryan's reputed fiscal bonafides but will actually promote their notability because he believes he has a winning hand going against them, whether they are true or not, & that he will nail free enterprise in America shut forever – it is this contrast that is key for the nation & our futures.  The major point of substance for us is what happens if Mitt & Ryan win?  Will they deliver or is it all rhetoric with us getting a few tweaks the first few months of 2013? 

 

The second response has the Ryan selection in the right proportion.

 

The third response discusses the presidential beauty contest that has bothered Neal Boortz for years – aka the likeability issue.

 

The fourth response from the Historian goes around the horn – first proving & then disproving the same premise.

 

---Response #1---

 

Mitt Needs a 'Willie Horton' like Commercial

Thanks Doug for explaining that Paul Ryan is far from a true conservative; nevertheless the Democrats and media are lying about him and his budget in overdrive and calling him an extreme right wing conservative.

BO is lying about both left and right. BO's lie about Mitt causing a woman to die from cancer is the number 1 LOW ever in American politics! Her husband worked for a Bain company after Mitt left in 1998. The woman had her own health insurance. In 2006, she was not feeling well and was diagnosed with cancer and died quickly while Mitt was in his 2nd year as Governor. This is 100% outrageous!

The Republicans must expose BO as the Marxist radical that he is. Republicans must not fear being truthful but controversial. A 'Willie Horton' like commercial can accomplish this. Here is a 'warm up' commercial -- http://economics501.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/commercial-t/  that I created and sent to Mitt, Monica Crowley, and Dick Morris. It pictures BO as a Marxist scholar in U of Chicago teaching a course how to destroy capitalism. It also pictures Acorn demonstrators rioting on a bank CEO's lawn demanding loans for people with ZERO % down. This was something BO trained many in. BO thus had a major role in creating the 2008 Great Recession and its aftermath – not George Bush!

Expect an enhanced version of this commercial soon as my 13 year old daughter is enhancing it with voice and video and special effects.

Other ones upcoming will be:

1 – BO building a New Top 1% comprised of BO czars and operatives (a modern Politburo)

2 – BO policies leading to Greece , Spain, Italy, Portugal like economic collapse with commercials displaying intense riots with a final question: do you want this in the USA?

3 – Michele Obama responding with a "SHHH" when someone commended her on the "stimulus" addressing economic growth. The "SHHH" as argued by IBD recently was to keep quiet about the real objective of the stimulus – shift available capital from the private economy to public to starve capitalism because BO wants to level the world playing field (bring the U.S. down) – well covered in Ed Klein's "Amateur' book about BO.

 

---Response #2---

 

I was so excited when I saw the subject heading....in spite of Ryan's clouded fiscal responsibility reputation, we must cling to the hope that he will be the fire that we need to prevent us from going down the tube!

 

---Response #3---

 

Hi Doug - In my opinion, Ryan brings to the table likeability. He is young, dynamic, eager, and charismatic. You can be the most conservative or liberal candidate in the field if they don't like you you'll never win. Ryan completely complements Romney. When it comes to picking a president, you and I part company. I believe people vote for who they like regardless of their record.

RTE - Oh I think the likeability aspect is very important – almost as important as how much government welfare is promised & delivered by a candidate. On both of these issues BO is the winner.

 

---Response #4 – The Historian---

 

Doug, You wrote a very good article..But I have to say, Romney-Ryan ticket will lose. Why??

Ticket heavy on conservative views...I notice whenever a party is top heavy with conservative views or liberal views - they lose elections.

I remember democrats having Stevenson running for President, who was very liberal - lost election. Also Humphrey running for office, also very liberal democrat- lost election

The American people do not want candidate top heavy in their views - But there are exceptions in life - this might be one of them with Romney-Ryan winning.