Ron Paul's Turn In The Hostile Anti-American Media's Barrel

Ron Paul got his turn in the subject barrel after he moved into the lead in the polls before the Iowa caucuses.  Last week Congressman Paul gained much notoriety by supposedly walking out of a too-tough CNN interview that questioned so-called incendiary racial remarks made in twenty year old newsletters that were published under his name such as Ron Paul's Freedom Report, the Ron Paul Survival Report, the Ron Paul Political Report and the Ron Paul Investment Letter.  At the time of most of these publications Dr. Paul had left Congress & was practicing medicine – a practice that includes being an obstetrician and gynecologist during the 1960s and 1970s, delivering more than 4,000 babies.

Although Dr. Paul has repeatedly disavowed the controversial remarks in these newsletters you can judge for yourself the validity of the claims by clicking on the CNN edited version of the entire interview that was shown on CNN (130,695 views on the internet plus the hundreds of thousands who saw it on CNN) & comparing it to the total unedited version (22,305 views on the internet).

Please notice how the edited version actually shown on CNN only focused on the incendiary matters that will have very little if any effect on your life if Congressman Paul is elected president – this is an example why I stopped watching the Communist News Network years ago.  Compare that to Congressman Paul's answers in the unedited version regarding regulating lobbyists' rights to petition the government, the description of how a declaration of war works, & why he would have used the principles of Letters of Marque & Reprisal after 9/11 to go after the Islamic fascist terrorists.