BO's anti-American plans have been obvious ever since he entered the national scene & lord knows I have tried to expose them with facts & common sense reasoning every chance I get. This posting focuses on the problems BO has caused (& is causing) people between 50 & retirement age & the two bookends of our society - seniors & young people, neither of whom have any relief in sight for what ails them. BO has isolated & made bookends out of these latter two groups & plans to compress our societies' decay using both of them with people between 50 & retirement age being the most immediately affected.
Looking back @ recent history many pundits have been wondering if something like Japan's lost decade (no economic growth) that started in 1990 could happen here. Well for starters Japan's lost decade is now exceeding two lost decades by my count. With America's jobloss & jobless economy starting in 2008 we are already well over three years into a lost decade of our own. Time moves on relentlessly for unemployed & underemployed people over 50 who have less & less time to financially recover before the time they would like to retire on their own terms with sufficient retirement income.
I know many people over 50 who have lost their jobs – people who will never work again @ the level they once knew unless BO is thrown out of office in 2012. How dignified is it for people who made $50,000 to $70,000 per year &, after months on end of being unemployed, now have jobs that pays between $20,000 to $25,000 per year? Now long time subscribers know I do not hold these people blameless in letting their skills deteriorate so that they now compete in trying to make a living with people in China who make pennies a day. The point is that thanks to whatever wealth they may have accumulated over the years it will now be spent down as asset principal is needed to be added to their meager wages to make their reduced ends meet what ever standard of living they can throw together – pitiful isn't it? – but in accordance with BO's design.
Now for BO's attack on seniors & youth.
1. Seniors who rely on CD interest income for even a portion of their income (like a little extra spending money) have been victimized by the Federal Reserve's artificial manipulation of interest rates to virtually zero. This damage to seniors has the beneficial effect for BO that the cost of all of his massive record borrowing is minimized – but @ the expense of savers. Occupy The Fed is more justified by seniors than OWS ever was in lower Manhattan by people who never knew why they were there.
2. The poor education & training systems (high school & college) in this country have caught up with America's youth – CUNY reports that "almost four out of every five freshmen who arrive @ its community colleges with a high school degree require remediation in reading, writing, & mathematics" – sounds like the three "Rs" with no hickory stick.
No entrepreneur is going to hire someone who can not add value to their enterprise. Accordingly, over 14% of the 42 million people aged 25 to 34 (compared with 10.6% in 2000) are forced to live in their parents' homes because they cannot support themselves. See graph below. A further breakdown of these stats reveals that 19% of men 25 to 34 & 10% of women 25 to 34 are forced to live with their parents – for those 18 to 24 it is 60% men & 50% women. This means that 5.9 million young people aged 25 to 34 who by the laws of the jungle should be living on their own have not really started to create their own wealth while in the meantime their parents wealth is deteriorating as the parents support the unemployed youth of America. Put another way BO has cheated today's youth that falls in this category (& more important to parents – much of tomorrow's youth because it will not get better) out of one quarter to one third of their lifetime earning power - wealth that will never be available to them to spend down decades from now.
By the Fed keeping interest rates artificially low seniors are forced to spend down their wealth (no matter how meager). BO's purposely dreadful economy keeps young people who can't find jobs from literally moving out of their parents' homes. Both phenomenons, coupled with what is happening to people between 50 & retirement age as explained above, keeps BO moving forward with his ideology of a government dependent society.
The two book ends – seniors & youth - of course squeezes the shrinking middle class. As current seniors die out they will be replaced by a far poorer group (the aforementioned portion of people over 50 with no or poor jobs) who has already spent down a good portion of whatever wealth they had. This obvious government dependent society progresses until today's youth becomes the pauper seniors of tomorrow.
BO's plan is as plain as the nose on your face & yet only one in five holds him responsible for the hard times described above according to the most recent WSJ/NBC News poll. Thirty four percent still blame Bush & 36% blame Wall Street Bankers meaning that OWS has been successful in deflecting responsibility away from BO thereby making our job that much harder yet.
As you know, you are preaching to the choir. However, I am not sure if BO would accept all the credit you are giving him.
ReplyDeleteDoug
ReplyDeleteYou are absolutely correct. BO economics follows "ideology of a government dependent society".
Part of this ideology is to destroy capitalism. Today IBD editorial "As banks struggle, US Govt tries to take them down" succinctly describes how socialist leaders have been attacking our financial system since 1995, accelerated by BO. Why?
BO tries to implement what Saul Alinsky stressed in his 'Rules for Radicals'. Alinsky identified banks as one of the main economic "powers sectors" and therefore a top "target". Alinsky wrote "the target therefore should be banks".
In my view, Alinsky updated mid 19 century Marxism to a late 20th century version. His top disciples BO and Van Jones are trying to implement this today.
We have tons of evidence supporting hypothesis that BO is a Marxist and is destroying capitalism in stages. Below - some recent evidence.
1. No Keystone pipeline so we will not hire 20,000, will increase our trade deficit, pay more at gas pump. China will now get the Canada energy contract.
2. Stop Boeing from hiring 1000's after building a $1 billion plant in right to work state SC.
3. Defying federal court, preventing oil companies from drilling in Gulf after persuading Import Export Bank to loan money to Brazil to drill there.
4. Playing venture capitalist with poor energy investments and paying off a political donor. Government: Get out of private markets. You are too incompetent!
Majority of Americans believe the country is headed in a ‘wrong’ direction. Let us define this ‘direction’ to our largely economic illiterate citizens. The direction is toward socialism, even Marxism. Americans - If you work for a private company, are an entrepreneur, or business owner, do you want government controlling your business? Government to decide maximum you can earn? Bureaucrats deciding your health care options? Government investing tax dollars to $ losing ventures private investors would never touch?
BO may be a very nice man and may sincerely believe Marxism is best for the US. When will a journalist politely confront BO about this? Let’s educate our journalists. Write letters and blog. Also educate your neighbors and friends.
References:
http://news.investors.com/Article/592861/201111251803/us-govt-conspires-against-banks.htm
http://economics501.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/21st-century-karl-marx/